Stay Plugged In With Canon
Latest News & Updates

In today’s fixed income environment, investors face competing pressures: the need to guard against rising rates and the desire to harvest yield from credit. Duration hedges like futures, swap, or curve strategies reduce sensitivity to interest rate moves, helping stabilize portfolio value when surprises hit. Yet hedges carry costs, imperfect coverage, and potential roll-down risks in aging curves. The craft is to calibrate hedge intensity so it complements genuine credit bets rather than substitutes for solid analysis. A balanced plan identifies a baseline duration target, considers scenario-driven adjustments, and uses hedges as a defensive toolkit rather than a constant shield that erodes potential upside in late-cycle recoveries.

Active credit exposure complements hedging by selectively adding securities that offer resilience to macro shocks and meaningful carry. Critics warn that high-quality bonds with modest spreads may underperform in tight markets, but diversified credit bets—across sectors, maturities, and capitalization sizes—can provide smoother returns when rates normalize. The key is disciplined credit selection: avoiding indiscriminate beta, favoring issuers with durable fit to structural themes, and prioritizing covenant strength, cash flow visibility, and liquidity. Firms with transparent earnings, sensible leverage, and clear growth paths tend to respond well to favorable demand cycles, supporting both income and capital preservation.

A practical starting point is to define a policy for weekly risk checks that capture both duration sensitivity and credit risk. The framework should specify an acceptable tracking error against a benchmark, a maximum drawdown threshold, and a horizon aligned with liquidity constraints. In practice, portfolio managers map exposure into segments: core government and high-grade core, rate-sensitive sectors, and higher-yield credit sleeves. The hedge program then aligns with those segments, ensuring that duration management does not blunt the opportunity set in the credits that promise durable earnings. Regular stress tests reveal where hedges may be too aggressive or too passive in different yield regimes.

Beyond mechanics, earned yield comes from understanding sector dynamics and issuer fundamentals. A well-balanced portfolio blends duration hedges to dampen price swings with credit selections that carry incremental carry or price appreciation potential. In constructive environments, hedges can be lightly scaled back to let credit beta express itself, while during volatility spikes, hedges may be increased to protect the capital base. The result is a modular approach: hedge components and credit exposures that can be tuned as markets shift, preserving liquidity, and maintaining a path to target returns.

When allocating to duration hedges, institutions favor transparent instrument lists, liquid contracts, and familiar term structures. The choice between futures versus swaps is guided by settlement mechanics, funding costs, and the ability to roll positions without adverse basis risk. A disciplined hedging program uses risk limits, monitors contango or backwardation in futures markets, and accounts for collateral costs. The objective is not to eliminate rate risk but to temper it enough to keep portfolio volatility within a defined band, allowing managers to pursue attractively priced credit opportunities without becoming vulnerable to abrupt shocks.

On the credit side, diversification remains essential. Rather than piling into one narrow niche, investors broaden exposure across industries, credit qualities, and durations to avoid concentration risk. Relative value opportunities—such as selective spread tightening in resilient sectors or duration-adjusted drawdown protection—are pursued with explicit exit strategies. Effective managers quantify the incremental yield relative to risk, embed scenario analysis into their decision trees, and ensure liquidity is sufficient to meet redemption demands or reallocation needs. The outcome is a steadier glide path toward yield and capital preservation.

A robust approach treats hedges as dynamic rather than permanent fixtures. During rising-rate cycles, hedges may be incrementally increased to maintain a controlled equity-like drawdown. Conversely, in flatter or easing environments, hedges can be trimmed, freeing capital for credit opportunities that benefit from stabilizing rates and improving risk premia. This rhythm requires governance that respects the portfolio’s stated objectives, risk tolerance, and liquidity profile. By documenting trigger points and review cadences, teams keep hedging decisions aligned with long-term targets, avoiding reactive moves driven by short-term sentiment. The discipline helps prevent over-hedging or under-hedging at critical moments.

The interplay between hedges and credit exposure also hinges on cost discipline. Hedge costs, roll spreads, and funding considerations influence net carry, which interacts with the incremental yield earned from credit positions. Managers should compare total expected return nets, including hedging expenses, to ensure that the net effect remains favorable. Ongoing cost monitoring enables adjustments such as shifting from more expensive instruments to cost-efficient alternatives without sacrificing risk protection. Clear budgeting for hedging and credit activities supports transparent performance attribution and helps clients understand how each element contributes to the overall outcome.

Liquidity remains the backbone of a balanced strategy. Hedges and credits alike demand timely execution and reliable pricing, especially under stress when markets thin. A liquidity-aware framework sets minimum trade sizes, preferred counterparties, and contingency plans for margin calls or forced unwind scenarios. It also emphasizes the role of cash buffers and liquid credits that can be repositioned quickly without destabilizing the portfolio. When liquidity is ample, more flexible credit bets can be pursued; when liquidity tightens, the emphasis shifts toward protection and preservation, maintaining the ability to adapt without sacrificing core objectives.

Risk governance should also evolve with market conditions. Independent risk reviews, reproducible performance reporting, and transparent model assumptions help prevent complacency. Managers who document reversal rules, such as when to unwind hedges or pare back certain credits, reduce the chance of late-stage errors. Clear accountability ensures that hedging decisions reflect both mathematical safeguards and nuanced market judgment. In resilient portfolios, risk controls operate hand in hand with a credible growth plan, enabling measured exposure to ideas that add value without courting excessive volatility.

Real-world portfolios illustrate how well-timed hedges and targeted credit bets can coexist. For example, a modest duration exposure paired with a diversified set of investment-grade credits may cushion price declines during rate shocks while still capturing spread compression when credits are supported by improving fundamentals. The art lies in keeping the hedge footprint flexible enough to adapt to evolving curves and in maintaining a steady cadence of credit reviews. A transparent framework helps investment teams justify changes and communicate to stakeholders why certain hedges stay in place while selective credits are rotated.

As investors chase yield in a volatile era, the best outcomes come from a deliberate, repeatable process. Balance the defensive power of duration hedges with the opportunistic potential of credit, never sacrificing core liquidity or risk controls. Build a layered approach where hedges, sector bets, and credit-quality choices reinforce one another rather than compete for attention. With disciplined governance, ongoing analysis, and cost-aware implementation, portfolios can protect against adverse scenarios while still delivering meaningful income through a complete market cycle.