Stay Plugged In With Canon
Latest News & Updates

Feature flags empower teams to toggle functionality without redeployments, yet client side implementations face unique challenges when connectivity falters. A resilient approach begins with a clear contract: the flag metadata must be available offline, while evaluation should gracefully degrade when network data is stale. This requires a trusted local cache that stores both flag definitions and their evaluated states. The cache must support deterministic reads, so the same inputs produce identical results across sessions. It should also respect a defined staleness policy, enabling the app to decide whether to refresh in the background or fall back to a conservative default. By design, this minimizes user disruption during offline periods and prevents unexpected feature exposure.

To implement this in practice, start with a centralized schema for flags that includes id, value, variant, priority, and a timestamp. The client fetches this schema during online periods and stores it alongside a small eviction policy. When offline, the app consults the in-memory cache first and then the persisted store, ensuring consistent behavior. An evaluation engine applies rules for defaulting, fallback variants, and experiment exposure, always returning a stable result for the user. Comprehensive testing should simulate slow networks, partial data, and abrupt disconnections, ensuring the system remains deterministic despite real world variability.

A reliable baseline means every flag is evaluated against a canonical set of rules, removing ambiguity in how a user experiences a feature during offline sessions. The evaluation pipeline should be invariant to the order of operations, so multiple asynchronously loaded sources cannot produce divergent outcomes. To achieve this, encode decision trees into compact, deterministic logic that runs locally. The system should also log, in a privacy-conscious manner, the rationale for a given decision without revealing sensitive data. By preserving a traceable path from flag definition to final result, teams can audit behavior after incidents and adjust policies confidently.

The caching layer must handle lifecycle events with care. On initial online load, fetch and merge remote definitions with local edits, then rewrite the cache to reflect the latest stable state. As connectivity deteriorates, the cache should progressively degrade rather than reset, maintaining previously approved decisions. A robust strategy includes versioning, so older caches do not silently override newer definitions. Additionally, implement a predictable fallback to default behavior when a flag reference is unknown or when the evaluation context is incomplete. Together these measures preserve user experience across online and offline boundaries.

Network instability is inevitable, but the system can absorb these disruptions without user impact by separating concerns: data freshness and evaluation determinism. Cache freshness policies determine when to refresh, while evaluation semantics guarantee the same result given the same inputs. The design should support multiple storage tiers, such as in memory for speed and persistent storage for resilience. When a device reboots or resumes after long offline periods, the cache rebuilds from the persisted store, avoiding a cold start that could cause inconsistent behavior. Clear migration strategies are essential when flag definitions evolve, ensuring backward compatibility and stability.

Consider user scope and rollout considerations within the caching strategy. Flags may differ by user groups, device capabilities, or app versions. The evaluator must apply scope rules consistently, even if the defining data changes during offline operation. By freezing the evaluation context for a session and binding it to a durable cache key, you guarantee that the same user continues to observe the same behavior across sessions. This approach reduces confusion and supports gradual rollout experiments without risking divergent experiences between reconnects. A thoughtful combination of scoping and caching yields predictability and trust.

Governance matters because offline behavior should reflect the same policy signals used online. Define who can modify flags, how changes propagate, and what constitutes acceptable drift when data is unavailable. Maintain a manifest of allowed variants and their sanctioned use cases, so the offline evaluator can reference it with confidence. Regularly audit the manifest against observed behavior in production to catch drift early. In practice, this means synchronizing policy changes with a predictable cadence and providing a rollback mechanism for flag definitions that may negatively impact users offline. Treat the cache as a trust boundary, not a single source of truth, and design accordingly.

From a developer experience perspective, provide a modular evaluation engine that can be swapped or extended without breaking existing behavior. The engine should expose stable APIs for fetching definitions, evaluating flags, and reporting outcomes. Extensibility is critical when new flag types appear, such as percentage-based toggles or context-aware variants. By decoupling evaluation logic from storage, teams can implement custom caching strategies, encryption for sensitive data, or platform-specific optimizations. Documentation and examples should demonstrate how to simulate offline scenarios, encouraging teams to validate resilience as part of regular development cycles.

A practical SDK path includes a pluggable storage adapter that abstracts the underlying cache, allowing you to switch between IndexedDB, LocalStorage, or a mobile keychain without touching business logic. The adapter should provide a consistent API for put, get, remove, and clear operations, plus a lightweight synchronization hook that knows when to refresh data. When connectivity returns, the synchronization should merge remote updates with local decisions using a well-defined conflict strategy. This minimizes data loss while preserving user-perceived stability across sessions. The SDK must also expose telemetry that helps teams monitor cache misses, refresh cadence, and evaluation latency.

Security and privacy cannot be afterthoughts in this domain. Ensure that sensitive flag data is either not persisted or is encrypted at rest, depending on regulatory requirements and risk appetite. Use secure defaults so that, in offline mode, no sensitive information leaks through logs or error messages. Implement access controls on who can trigger cache updates and who can view evaluation results within the app. By integrating security considerations from the outset, you reduce the likelihood of inadvertently exposing user data during offline operation and fortify the overall resilience of the system.

Testing resilience demands more than unit tests; it requires end-to-end scenarios that mimic real offline conditions. Create synthetic networks that simulate long outages, intermittent connectivity, and abrupt transitions back online. Validate that the same evaluation result is produced for identical inputs across sessions, and verify that the cache does not regress when updates occur. Automated tests should cover edge cases such as missing definitions, unknown variants, and context changes that happen while offline. By embedding these tests into CI pipelines, teams enforce stability and confidence as the feature flag system evolves.

Finally, cultivate a culture of observability around offline caching and evaluation. Instrument hooks to capture cache health, decision latencies, and failure modes. Dashboards should highlight stale data, refresh timing, and the rate of fallback default usage during offline periods. When incidents arise, postmortems should identify whether the root cause was data drift, cache corruption, or evaluation nondeterminism, and prescribe concrete mitigations. With disciplined monitoring and proactive governance, resilient client side feature flag caching becomes a reliable foundation for consistent behavior across both online and offline sessions.