Stay Plugged In With Canon
Latest News & Updates

Thorough title and survey reviews form the cornerstone of sound commercial real estate decisions. In practice, these processes should begin during initial due diligence and continue through closing to ensure no critical issues slip through the cracks. Focus on assembling a complete chain of title, including all recorded documents, judgments, and liens that could affect ownership or use. Simultaneously, scrutinize the survey for boundary accuracy, setback compliance, and any discrepancies between plat records and on-site conditions. By integrating title and survey findings early, a project team can forecast risk, allocate contingencies, and craft mitigations before legal or regulatory headaches arise.

A disciplined approach to title review starts with verifying ownership history and vested interests. Examine grants, quitclaims, and any outstanding encumbrances that might limit conveyance or future development. Pay attention to heirs’ claims, easements of access, and rights-of-way that could affect both current operations and future expansions. Cross-check reliefs, restrictions, and covenants against planned use to avoid clashes between permitted activities and actual property rights. This diligence reduces the chance of post-closing surprises that can derail timelines, inflate costs, or compel property redesigns after a deal appears signed.

The first practical step is to align title and survey objectives with the deal’s strategic goals. Establish what constitutes acceptable risk, what encumbrances are negotiable, and which constraints require legal remedies or municipal concessions. Create a cross-functional checklist that includes ownership history, lien status, and any easements that could restrict access or utility installation. Engage a titles attorney early to interpret complex language, especially in releases, reservations, and non-trust instruments. By documenting interpretations and decisions, the team can maintain transparency, accelerate negotiations, and set precise expectations with lenders and investors.

Survey reviews should translate legal boundaries into real-world implications. Compare plat dimensions to actual stakes and fencing, verifying that improvements sit inside legal parcels. Identify encroachments from neighboring parcels, which can complicate future expansion or trigger boundary disputes. Track easements for utilities, drainage, and access, noting who benefits and who bears maintenance responsibilities. Document any inconsistencies between old surveys and recent measurements, and investigate potential changes in setbacks, height restrictions, or land-use approvals that could affect project feasibility. Clear, actionable findings prevent design conflicts and regulatory delays.

Encroachments pose a particular risk because they often surface quietly but can derail construction plans. A proactive review compares survey lines to recorded plats, then probes irregularities such as corner setbacks or shared corridors. If an encroachment exists, assess remedies including boundary reconfiguration, purchase options, or easement modifications. Understand how any encroachment could influence insurance, lenders’ collateral requirements, and title insurance coverage. Prepare scenario analyses that quantify potential cost impacts, schedule disruptions, and necessary negotiations with adjoining landowners. Early awareness enables decisive actions rather than reactive, costly last-minute fixes.

Easements carry practical consequences beyond mere paperwork. Map every easement to its practical outcomes: right-of-way limitations, access routes, utility placements, and maintenance duties. Investigate whether easements are exclusive or nonexclusive, permanent or temporary, and whether they are intended to survive future transfers. Evaluate whether existing easements hinder proposed improvements such as new building envelopes, parking layouts, or stormwater infrastructure. If constraints threaten project viability, explore alternatives like relocating facilities, negotiating easement modifications, or securing new rights through mutually beneficial agreements. A well-documented easement profile promotes smoother financing and smoother construction phasing.

Development constraints extend beyond current land use to zoning, permits, and environmental considerations. Review zoning designations, overlay districts, and any planned amendments that could alter allowed densities or uses. Verify whether variances or special permits would be required and whether they carry feasibility risks or lengthy approval timelines. Look for environmental constraints such as flood plains, wetlands, or endangered species habitats that could trigger mitigation measures or costly redesigns. Compile regulatory risk into a forecasting model that aligns with project milestones and financing covenants. Early clarity on these constraints helps the team craft compliant, market-ready development concepts.

A comprehensive extraction of all encumbrances should include historic notes and practical implications. Assemble a digest that links each recorded item to potential operational constraints, financial impacts, and permit implications. For instance, an old deed restriction may limit exterior alterations or require aesthetic treatments, while a utility easement might affect where a driveway or loading dock can be placed. When possible, secure waivers, releases, or amendment language during negotiation. This proactive documentation prevents later disputes that can stall value realization or complicate refinancing. Concrete summaries enable clearer decision-making for investors, lenders, and developers.

The task of compiling an integrated title and survey package is best done with a single point of contact who coordinates all documents. Establish a workflow that brings together the chain of title, lien statuses, and survey plats into a unified file with version control. Ensure every document bears clear dates, authoritative sources, and responsible parties. This approach facilitates rapid verification by lenders and auditors and reduces the risk of misinterpretation. Regular status updates during due diligence help keep the process transparent, collaborative, and focused on identifying deal-breakers before contracts are binding.

Collaboration across disciplines strengthens the accuracy of findings. Involve surveyors, attorneys, brokers, and engineers to challenge assumptions and surface conflicts early. Schedule joint review sessions where each team member explains implications of encumbrances and how they intersect with design plans. Use visual aids like updated plat overlays and red-lined plan changes to communicate clearly. By fostering cross-functional dialogue, you uncover hidden risks, validate mitigation strategies, and build a shared commitment to pursuing the best path forward for the property and the project schedule.

Once you have gathered and interpreted title and survey data, translate results into actionable milestones. Create a risk register that assigns owners, deadlines, and contingency budgets for each encumbrance or constraint. Prioritize issues by potential impact on closing timelines, financing feasibility, and construction sequencing. Develop alternative strategies, such as negotiating tract boundaries, obtaining consent from lenders, or adjusting project scopes to accommodate limits. Communicate findings succinctly in executive summaries and board-ready briefings, ensuring stakeholders understand the implications for value, risk, and return on investment.

Finally, build a durable process for future deals. Establish standard operating procedures that codify title and survey review steps, data retention practices, and escalation paths for disputes. Invest in up-to-date title plant access, survey technologies, and continuing education for the team. Regularly audit the diligence workflow to identify bottlenecks and incorporate lessons learned from prior transactions. By treating thorough title and survey reviews as ongoing capabilities rather than one-off tasks, you create a competitive advantage that supports faster closings, greater predictability, and more resilient outcomes for commercial development portfolios.