Stay Plugged In With Canon
Latest News & Updates

When a construction project changes hands, a thoughtful approach to novations and assignments is essential to preserve project momentum while shielding parties from surprise liabilities. The first step is identifying every contract that may be affected, including design agreements, subcontractor relationships, and procurement terms. This inventory enables a clear map of who bears responsibility for performance, insurance, warranties, and remedies in case of defaults or delays. Early diligence helps uncover potential conflicts between existing obligations and the new owner’s objectives, prompting proactive negotiation of terms that transfer risk in a controlled, predictable manner. Without this groundwork, project teams risk abrupt liability shifts that disrupt timelines and budgets.

The core distinction between novation and assignment matters in practice. A contract assignment transfers rights but generally leaves the original party on the hook for performance unless novated, whereas a novation substitutes the new party for the original performer with consent from all affected parties. In complex construction settings, relying on a simple assignment can leave unresolved liabilities behind. Early conversations about consent, consent timing, and the scope of the novation can prevent later disputes over scope, change orders, or warranty claims. Clear language surrounding performance standards, acceptance criteria, and risk allocation is pivotal to avoid ambiguity.

Begin with a comprehensive risk assessment that catalogs every obligation under active agreements, including performance milestones, payment schedules, bonds, and insurance coverage. This assessment should extend beyond the primary contract to all leveraged subcontracts, supply contracts, and consultant engagements. The goal is to identify which party will bear each risk if project circumstances shift, such as contractor insolvency, design changes, or force majeure. Documented risk ownership becomes the backbone of negotiation, guiding where the transfer should occur and which liabilities must ride along to the successor entity. By anchoring decisions in the risk map, teams avoid ad hoc assignments that could create gaps in coverage.

Following the risk assessment, engage stakeholders early to establish a funding and liability framework. In practice, this means aligning the procurement, design, legal, and risk managers on a common theory of liability and transfer mechanics. Stakeholder alignment helps prevent last-minute objections that delay approvals or derail transfers. It also supports the drafting phase, where precise definitions of “assignee,” “successor,” and “conforming party” govern who is responsible for which aspects of performance, warranty, and insurance. Transparent dialogue reduces the odds of misinterpretation and creates a shared reference point for future disputes, should any arise during handover.

The contract language used for novations and assignments should be unambiguous about consent, effectiveness, and scope. A well-drafted novation agreement should specify who is released from liability, who assumes responsibility, and the exact performance standards to be maintained. It should also address the treatment of existing change orders, unresolved claims, and ongoing disputes so that the new party inherits a clearly defined position. Consider inserting a sunset clause for transitional liabilities, which provides a finite period during which the original party remains partially liable for discrete, backlogged issues. Such provisions minimize open-ended exposure while preserving project continuity.

Another critical element is the allocation of insurance and bonding. Ensure that coverage under the original policy is not inadvertently negated, and confirm whether a new policy or an endorsement is required for the assignee or acquirer. The assignment or novation should spell out who maintains coverage for completed work, latent defects, and third-party claims. Clarify whether certificates of insurance need to reflect the new party as the primary insured and how endorsements address additional insured status and waiver of subrogation. Aligning insurance expectations with contractual risk transfer avoids gaps that could trigger expensive litigation later.

Warranty regimes must migrate cleanly when a project changes hands. The novation should specify which warranties survive, for how long, and under what conditions they may be asserted by the owner or end users. It is essential to determine whether warranty triggers relate to performance milestones or to the completion of certain project phases. If latent defects are involved, the agreement should designate a clear path for remedy, including discovery timelines and remedies available to the new owner. Without explicit language, warranty disputes can stall operations and complicate claims processing, undermining confidence in the transfer.

The governance framework for the transferred contract deserves careful attention. Establish a transition plan that assigns the new party’s responsibilities for ongoing coordination, reporting, and escalation. A well-defined governance structure reduces ambiguity about who leads technical discussions, who approves substitutions, and who manages safety compliance during the transfer period. Additionally, align communication protocols to ensure all stakeholders—including lenders, tenants, and project managers—receive timely updates. A robust governance model enhances performance transparency and supports accountability, helping prevent missteps that could trigger financial or regulatory penalties.

Integrating administrative systems is a practical yet often overlooked element of a smooth transfer. Ensure that least-disruption data migration occurs for project management platforms, scheduling tools, document repositories, and financial systems. A detailed data handover checklist minimizes the risk of missing critical documents such as permits, licenses, approvals, and inspection records. Assign responsibility for migrating contacts, protocols, and escalation matrices to the receiving party. Inconsistent record-keeping can sow confusion during critical decision points, delaying approvals and complicating claims processing. A rigorous transition protocol preserves continuity and supports auditors and lenders who review project history.

The human side of the handoff is as important as the legal mechanics. Facilitate a structured onboarding for the incoming team, including site leadership, superintendent discipline, and field engineers. Clear briefing sessions help transfer tacit knowledge about site conditions, neighbor relations, and safety practices. Establish contact hierarchies so subcontractors know whom to approach for approvals or concerns. Effective onboarding encourages collaboration, reduces resistance to change, and accelerates performance under new ownership. When people understand their roles and responsibilities, the project maintains momentum despite ownership changes.

Before closing a novation or assignment, conduct a comprehensive verification to confirm that all parties have provided necessary consents and that all conditions precedent are satisfied. A thorough diligence process should verify that rights, obligations, and remedies transfer as intended, with no lingering contingencies. Cross-check the remaining liquidity for the project to ensure the new owner can fund ongoing milestones and obligations. Prepare a closing binder containing all executed documents, schedules, and amendments, along with a record of insurance endorsements and change orders. This repository serves as a durable reference that supports post-close audits and future disputes, should they arise.

Finally, establish a post-close review to monitor performance against the transfer plan. Schedule periodic check-ins to assess whether liability allocations are functioning as expected, and adjust as necessary through supplementary agreements or amendments. Track warranty claims, insurance lapses, and any disputed change orders to identify systemic issues early. A proactive post-close governance routine helps preserve value, protects the project’s integrity, and reinforces trust among owners, lenders, and contractors. By closing with disciplined documentation and ongoing oversight, the risk of unintended liability diminishes significantly and the project remains on track.