Stay Plugged In With Canon
Latest News & Updates

In any M&A dialogue, the initial step toward protecting sensitive information is to establish a clear and comprehensive confidentiality framework. This framework should articulate the parties involved, the purpose of information sharing, and the scope of protected material, including trade secrets, financials, customer lists, supplier contracts, and strategic roadmaps. It should also specify permissible use limits, prohibit unauthorized disclosure, and set expectations for handling information across all stages of diligence. A well-crafted framework anticipates cross-border considerations, different legal regimes, and potential conflicts of interest. It also creates a practical baseline for enforcing later obligations, reducing ambiguity that might otherwise invite disputes or inadvertent disclosures.

Beyond generic promises, the confidentiality regime must codify precise remedies and enforcement mechanisms. This includes the assignment of who bears liability for breaches, the remedies available in case of leakage, and the process for seeking injunctive relief when time is critical. The agreement should address return or destruction of materials, preservation of evidence during investigations, and, importantly, carve-outs for compelled disclosures under law with prescribed notice procedures. It may also outline the obligations that survive the termination of negotiations, ensuring that post-deal confidentiality remains intact during and after a sale process. Drafting with enforceability in mind helps deter circumvention and supports ongoing valuation integrity.

A practical emphasis in drafting is to define what constitutes confidential information with specificity. Identify categories of information as clearly as possible—such as detailed financial models, customer due diligence materials, proprietary software code, product roadmaps, and non-public supplier terms. Include examples to minimize disputes over what is covered and to set a standard for materiality. Distinguish between confidential information that is publicly available and material that, if disclosed, would undermine competitive advantage. Consider whether to include oral disclosures and the requirement that such communications be promptly reduced to writing and marked as confidential, or subject to a confidentiality acknowledgment within a defined period.

The confidentiality obligations should be paired with robust access controls and handling procedures. Define who within each party may view the information and under what conditions. Require secure transmission methods, encrypted storage, and access logs to monitor who reviews sensitive data. Incorporate reasonable security standards aligned with industry practice and applicable regulatory requirements. Establish a chain of custody for documents, restrict printing or downloading of critical files, and set a timeframe for retention or destruction. These operational measures reinforce the legal commitments and make enforcement more straightforward if a breach occurs.

Negotiations often require sharing information with third parties such as external advisors, consultants, or financial sponsors. The confidentiality agreement should authorize disclosures to those involved in the process while binding them to equivalent confidentiality obligations. This requires careful drafting of a permissible disclosures clause, including the need for confidentiality agreements with third parties, safeguarding provisions, and a requirement that recipients use information solely for the contemplated transaction. To prevent inadvertent breaches, include a prohibition on public announcements related to the deal without prior consent, ensuring that strategic communication remains tightly controlled during sensitive diligence phases.

Equally important is to craft carve-outs that reflect legitimate business needs without eroding protection. Typical exemptions cover information already known by the recipient, information independently developed without reference to the discloser's data, or information disclosed by a third party without breach of an obligation. Another essential carve-out relates to disclosures required by law, regulation, or stock exchange rules, accompanied by reasonable notice to the discloser and an opportunity to seek protective orders. These carve-outs should be narrowly tailored to avoid broad eroding impacts on the confidentiality regime while still accommodating compliance duties.

A well-balanced confidentiality agreement contemplates both deterrence and remedies. Include injunctive relief provisions that allow prompt court intervention to halt ongoing or imminent breaches, recognizing the reality that monetary damages may be insufficient in protecting trade secrets. Specify the available remedies such as specific performance, damages, and, where appropriate, equitable relief. Clearly outline the procedure for initiating disputes, including governing law, forum, and expedited relief options. Consider whether to require a security bond or other risk mitigants. By detailing remedies, the agreement discourages casual breaches and aligns incentives toward careful handling of sensitive information.

In addition to remedies, incorporate practical audit and enforcement mechanisms. Permitting reasonable audits or inspections by the discloser’s counsel or designated independent experts, under controlled conditions, can deter misuse. Establish a notice-and-access protocol for monitoring potential breaches, while preserving the recipients’ operational autonomy. Include cooperation requirements, such as promptly reporting suspected breaches, preserving relevant materials, and providing access to logs or systems for investigation. The enforcement framework should be credible without becoming burdensome, striking a balance between effective protection and reasonable business operations.

Valuation sensitivity is central to M&A negotiations, and confidentiality obligations must address the protection of valuation models, discount rates, comparable data, and due diligence findings. Define the limits of permissible use for valuation information, ensuring that analyses and conclusions drawn from confidential data do not themselves leak or circulate beyond the transaction team. Consider requiring separate, sealed access to highly sensitive valuation materials and restricting dissemination to personnel directly involved in the process. Tie retention periods to deal timelines, so that obsolete analysis does not linger where it could become a target for misappropriation.

An effective agreement also contemplates governance around information during the integration or post-deal period. Include a transition plan that specifies how long confidential materials may be retained after closing, how they will be securely archived, and the process for their ultimate destruction. Address questions about employee information, supplier terms, and strategic plans that might influence competition post-transaction. When information flows into integration structures, ensure that confidentiality controls remain aligned with operational realities and regulatory expectations, reducing the risk of accidental disclosures amid organizational changes.

Begin with a clear, well-structured definition section that leaves little room for interpretation. Use precise terms to identify who is bound, what is protected, and under which circumstances disclosure is permissible. Include a robust term that extends beyond the negotiation period to cover post-deal confidentiality, without creating undue burdens on the recipient. The agreement should also anticipate disputes by incorporating an agreed-upon governing law and a streamlined dispute resolution mechanism. Finally, consider including a robust annex with sample exhibits, such as a list of confidential materials, a schedule of restricted disclosures, and a template for notice of breach.

End with a practical, business-friendly implementation plan. Provide guidance on who must sign, how information is labeled, and the process for securely transmitting documents. Emphasize the roles of legal, compliance, and information security teams in maintaining ongoing protection. Include a periodic review clause to adapt the confidentiality framework to evolving regulatory standards, new technologies, or changes in the transactional structure. This forward-looking approach helps sustain enforceability through different deal phases and across potential regulatory environments while preserving the integrity of both parties’ confidential assets throughout the diligence journey.