Stay Plugged In With Canon
Latest News & Updates

In strategic transactions, corporations bring in board advisors who contribute critical insights while parties seek to protect privileged communications. A well-structured confidentiality undertaking should clearly identify the advisor’s role, the information to be protected, and the applicable legal privileges at stake. It must delineate the purpose of disclosure, the scope of the materials covered, and the conditions under which information may be accessed, used, or shared. The document should also specify the time limits for confidentiality, the situations that qualify as permissible disclosure to related professionals, and the steps required to handle inadvertent disclosures or breaches. Clarity here reduces ambiguity and strengthens privilege claims.

A robust confidentiality undertaking should acknowledge the privilege framework governing the engagement, including attorney-client and work-product protections where relevant. It should state that communications involving strategy, due diligence, or negotiations remain privileged if they are confidential and intended to be confidential. The undertaking should address the role of the advisor as a temporary conduit rather than a permanent recipient of sensitive information, emphasizing the need to minimize unnecessary dissemination. It is prudent to require the advisor to acknowledge duty of confidentiality, to refrain from copying or reproducing materials beyond what is necessary, and to return or destroy materials when the engagement ends.

The document must define the types of information covered by confidentiality with precision. This includes board materials, financial projections, strategic assessments, and nonpublic operational data. It should distinguish between information that remains within a privileged frame and information that is more generalized or publicly available. The undertaking should establish procedures for labeling, handling, and storing confidential materials, along with restrictions on forwarding documents to third parties. Moreover, it should identify the permissible recipients and require the advisor to obtain attorney approval before sharing anything that could compromise privilege.

To preserve privilege across jurisdictions, the undertaking should incorporate cross-border considerations, recognizing that privilege norms vary. It should specify governing law and the venue for disputes, as well as any international data transfer safeguards applicable to the information. The agreement should address cooperation with regulators, auditors, or financing partners without eroding privilege protections. It is essential to set expectations about secure communication channels, encryption, and audit trails. Clear controls help ensure that strategic deliberations remain shielded from unintended disclosure, preserving the integrity of the negotiation process.

A well-drafted undertaking requires the advisor to explicitly acknowledge and adhere to confidentiality obligations for the duration of the engagement. It should prescribe the minimum standard of care, such as exercising reasonable precautions to protect information from unauthorized access. The agreement should prohibit casual discussions of confidential matters outside the engagement and restrict access to devices, networks, or locations where sensitive data could be exposed. An explicit provision about return or destruction of confidential materials at the end of the relationship helps prevent residual exposure, especially for archived or backup systems.

The document should address the risk of inadvertent disclosures, including what constitutes a breach and the remedies available to the company. It should outline a notification protocol for incidents, timelines for reporting, and the roles of relevant personnel in managing repercussions. The undertaking may specify consequences for the advisor, up to possible injunctive relief or damages in cases of willful or grossly negligent behavior. Incorporating a cure period for unintentional breaches can provide fairness while maintaining a strong incentive for compliance.

A precise scope of permitted disclosures is essential. The undertaking should define the circumstances under which information may be shared with external counsel, financial advisors, or consultants, ensuring that these recipients are bound by equivalent confidentiality obligations. It should prohibit disclosures to competitors or nonessential personnel, and it should require secure methods for sharing privileged materials. The document should also address use limitations, clarifying that material may be used solely for the purposes of the strategic transaction and related governance matters, not for any unrelated advantage.

Retention and archival policies play a critical role in upholding privilege. The confidentiality undertaking should require retention schedules that protect privileged materials from unnecessary exposure while still enabling proper analysis and regulatory compliance. It should specify the duration of retention and the circumstances under which records may be archived, de-identified, or destroyed. Importantly, the agreement should set out a process for verifying compliance with retention policies, including periodic reviews and audits to detect and correct deviations promptly.

Effective communication protocols are essential to minimize leakage risk. The undertaking should mandate the use of secure channels, authenticated access, and encrypted transmissions for all privileged information. It should restrict meetings to controlled environments and require agendas and minutes that capture sensitive topics without exposing them to broader audiences. The document should address the handling of electronic communications, such as email and chat platforms, ensuring that any exchange remains within sanctioned systems and that copies or printouts are safeguarded.

In addition to technical safeguards, the undertaking should outline governance expectations for the advisor. It should require that the advisor disclose any potential conflicts of interest promptly and recuse themselves from decisions where there is a real or perceived problem. The agreement should articulate the scope of the advisor’s authority and the need for prior clearance before participating in high-stakes discussions that could reveal privileged reasoning. Clear governance reduces the chance of inadvertent exposure and preserves the integrity of strategic deliberations.

A confidentiality undertaking must anticipate changes in circumstances and provide a mechanism for amendment. It should permit updates to reflect new regulatory requirements, evolving deal structures, or shifts in the composition of the advisory team. The document should specify the protocol for obtaining consents and ensuring that amendments do not weaken privilege protections. It should also call for periodic reviews of the agreement to align with best practices and to address any emerging risks in the deal lifecycle.

Finally, the document should include boilerplate provisions that reinforce enforceability. These include severability, non-waiver, integration, and notices clauses. The undertaking should expressly preserve the company’s rights to seek injunctive relief in the event of injury to privilege, while ensuring that the advisor’s confidentiality duties survive the termination of the engagement. By combining precise scope, robust safeguards, and clear remedies, a confidentiality undertaking supports prudent governance and smoother strategic transactions.