Stay Plugged In With Canon
Latest News & Updates

In real estate transactions, a power of attorney (POA) can accelerate closings and provide flexibility when a buyer, seller, or borrower cannot attend in person. However, relying on a POA without proper validation creates exposure to fraud, missing contingencies, or inadvertent invalidation of the instrument. Wise practitioners begin by confirming the exact form and scope of authority granted, including any limitations on conveyance types or geographic reach. They verify the principal’s capacity, ensure the POA is current, and check whether any state-specific rules apply to instruments used for real estate transfers. Thorough pre-closing review reduces downstream disputes and protects both parties from unexpected legal gaps.

A robust validation process starts with obtaining a certified copy of the POA and, when available, the original document. It is essential to inspect the instrument for proper execution— signatures, dates, and witness or notary acknowledgments—since defects here can render the POA void. Lawyers should confirm the principal’s intent is clearly expressed and that the agent’s power remains in force at the time of closing. If the POA contains a “springing” or revocation clause, counsel should verify triggering conditions and confirm that the closing team has evidence the conditions were satisfied. Comprehensive validation supports enforceability and helps resist challenges later in the transaction.

The first step in validating a POA is to catalog the exact powers granted, including whether the agent can convey, mortgage, lease, or execute documents on behalf of the principal. Agents must operate within these boundaries; any overreach can jeopardize the deed’s validity or invite claims of excess authority. Attorneys should cross-check the POA with the governing state statute to determine whether the powers align with real estate transactions in that jurisdiction. It is also prudent to verify compliance with any financial or health-related provisions that might accompany an agent’s duties. Clear alignment between the instrument and the transaction reduces the risk of later disputes about scope.

After confirming scope, practitioners evaluate the principal’s capacity and voluntariness at the time the POA was executed. Mental incapacity, duress, or misrepresentation can undermine validity and invite undue influence allegations. Records such as medical notes, contemporaneous witnesses, or prior filings can support capacity claims. If integrity concerns exist, counsel may request independent medical opinions or reminiscence testimony to establish a continuum of competence. Additionally, it is wise to investigate whether the principal was surrounded by advisers who pressured or manipulated decisions. Documentation demonstrating voluntary and informed execution is a key shield against later claims of coercion or exploitation.

In the closing room, the attorney should confirm that the agent presents acceptable identification and that there is a solid chain of custody for the POA document. The notary or witness process must be thorough to prevent later challenges on authenticity. Attorneys should compare the signer’s signature on the POA with prior records, ensuring consistency. If the instrument includes witnesses, their statements can reinforce legitimacy, though their absence does not automatically invalidate the POA. For lenders and title companies, a due diligence review that notes any irregularities in execution or notarization can be crucial. Ultimately, certainty about authenticity reduces risk in the closing process and supports enforceability.

Beyond authentication, practitioners ought to examine whether the POA is durable and whether it survives the principal’s incapacity. A durable POA maintains authority even if the principal becomes incapacitated, which is common in elderly or ill clients. Some states require specific language to ensure durability, and others recognize durable powers by virtue of the document’s wording. If a durable POA exists, counsel should verify its effective date and whether any revocation provisions were triggered before the closing. When capacity or longevity is questionable, additional safeguards—such as a contemporaneous inquiry into the principal’s current wishes—may be warranted to avoid later disputes about the agent’s authority.

The next critical focus is the agent’s duties and any fiduciary constraints. Real estate closings demand compliance with ethical standards, including faithful disclosure, avoidance of self-dealing, and the prohibition of adverse personal profits from the transaction. Review the POA for prohibitions or conflicts of interest that could surface during conveyance, refinancing, or loan origination. If the instrument grants broad authority, counsel should ensure there are safeguards, such as requiring the agent to obtain court approval for certain acts or to provide periodic accounts of actions taken under the POA. Clear fiduciary boundaries help prevent misuses and protect the principal’s estate plan.

Communication with all parties is essential to prevent misinterpretation. The closing attorney should notify the lender, title insurer, and real estate brokers about the POA’s existence, scope, and any limitations. Transparent disclosure reduces the chances of hidden inconsistencies surfacing after signing and minimizes the likelihood of institutional resistance. It is prudent to attach a copy of the POA to the closing package when permissible, along with a short narrative describing the agent’s authorized powers. When all participants share a common understanding, the risk of post-closing claims or litigation declines significantly.

Undue influence is a central risk factor in POA-driven real estate deals. Attorneys must assess whether family dynamics, financial pressures, or caregiver relationships have unduly steered the principal toward signing the instrument. A structured interview process with the principal, separate from the agent, can help detect coercive tactics. If concerns arise, counsel should recommend suspending action, seeking independent counsel for the principal, or requesting a court-appointed referee to validate the instrument’s authenticity and voluntariness. The goal is to ensure the POA stands on a foundation of free will rather than manipulation, thereby strengthening the closing and protecting the principal’s interests.

Practitioners should document every step of the validation and risk assessment. File notes should capture observations about the principal’s health, independence, and understanding of the transaction. Record the identities and roles of witnesses, notaries, and collaborating professionals. When possible, obtain statements from independent advisors who can confirm the principal’s capacity and lack of coercion. A well-documented file can be decisive if a challenge arises later, whether from a court, a title insurer, or a party to the deal. The objective is to create a sustainable record that supports the integrity of the POA.

In addition to internal checks, assess the potential for revocation of the POA before or during the closing. A revocation can suddenly erase authority and jeopardize the transaction. Counsel should search public records or notice provisions in the instrument to confirm revocation triggers, such as death, disability, or explicit revocation by the principal. If there is a risk of revocation, parties may implement interim protective measures, like temporary approvals or independent adjournments, to avoid abrupt halts. Creating a plan for continuity helps ensure the closing remains viable under various contingencies. Planning for revocation reduces the chance of costly delays or post-closing disputes.

Finally, developers and practitioners should consider remedial strategies for potential disputes. If a claim of undue influence surfaces after closing, timely expert testimony, a comprehensive audit of the POA’s execution, and a careful comparison to the principal’s prior intentions can be compelling defenses. Courts often look at the totality of circumstances, including the principal’s age, health, and relationships, before invalidating an instrument. By prioritizing rigorous validation, transparent communications, and robust documentation, real estate teams can complete secure closings while safeguarding the principal’s autonomy and the transaction’s legitimacy.